<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Second life - BAN IT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://edorigami.edublogs.org/2008/05/09/second-life-ban-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://edorigami.edublogs.org/2008/05/09/second-life-ban-it/</link>
	<description>ICT and Education</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Warlick</title>
		<link>http://edorigami.edublogs.org/2008/05/09/second-life-ban-it/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>David Warlick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 09:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edorigami.edublogs.org/2008/05/09/second-life-ban-it/#comment-181</guid>
		<description>What gripes me about this development is not so much losing the instructional benefits of Second Life, though I agree, that there seem to be amazing untapped opportunities.  It's the politics of the thing.  It's the notion that I can get people to vote for me, if I can make them afraid of something.

In my country, it works.  Fear is potent politics.  As you describe, a revision of DOPA (Delete Online Predators Act -- an unsuccessful bill introduced around our last election, designed to make people afraid of MySpace) would do nothing to protect children.  They (politicians) wouldn't dare suggest walls around town to protect children.  But walls around our schools, well that makes us feel, not safe, but like we're actually doing something -- and it's easy to do things to public schools.

I've spent time in Second Life, and although I do see the potential, I'm not sure that it's Second Life that will exploit that potential.  There are other Virtual World tools out there, and many in development, and I think that when we can have a virtual world service that is dedicated to learning, then we'll start seeing some of the untapped potentials and even unimagined applications.

I guess that my hope is that the last several years, here in the U.S., have taught Americans that fear is not an appropriate motivation to take with you into the voting booth, and that politicians will learn that solutions win votes, not warnings...

Thanks for continuing the conversation.

-- dave --</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What gripes me about this development is not so much losing the instructional benefits of Second Life, though I agree, that there seem to be amazing untapped opportunities.  It&#8217;s the politics of the thing.  It&#8217;s the notion that I can get people to vote for me, if I can make them afraid of something.</p>
<p>In my country, it works.  Fear is potent politics.  As you describe, a revision of DOPA (Delete Online Predators Act &#8212; an unsuccessful bill introduced around our last election, designed to make people afraid of MySpace) would do nothing to protect children.  They (politicians) wouldn&#8217;t dare suggest walls around town to protect children.  But walls around our schools, well that makes us feel, not safe, but like we&#8217;re actually doing something &#8212; and it&#8217;s easy to do things to public schools.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve spent time in Second Life, and although I do see the potential, I&#8217;m not sure that it&#8217;s Second Life that will exploit that potential.  There are other Virtual World tools out there, and many in development, and I think that when we can have a virtual world service that is dedicated to learning, then we&#8217;ll start seeing some of the untapped potentials and even unimagined applications.</p>
<p>I guess that my hope is that the last several years, here in the U.S., have taught Americans that fear is not an appropriate motivation to take with you into the voting booth, and that politicians will learn that solutions win votes, not warnings&#8230;</p>
<p>Thanks for continuing the conversation.</p>
<p>&#8211; dave &#8211;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barb</title>
		<link>http://edorigami.edublogs.org/2008/05/09/second-life-ban-it/#comment-180</link>
		<dc:creator>Barb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 01:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edorigami.edublogs.org/2008/05/09/second-life-ban-it/#comment-180</guid>
		<description>This is such on sad commentary on our times that whenever we encounter something new in technology  it must be banned. Many schools block anything web 2.0 and interactive, you tube, mobile phones let alone second life. When are we ever going to teach appropriate use and responsibility. Must we be afraid of every new technology that comes our way? Let's look at the positives and see how we can use  them to help us in our learning and keep spreading the message of the 21st Century to our communities.
comment08</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is such on sad commentary on our times that whenever we encounter something new in technology  it must be banned. Many schools block anything web 2.0 and interactive, you tube, mobile phones let alone second life. When are we ever going to teach appropriate use and responsibility. Must we be afraid of every new technology that comes our way? Let&#8217;s look at the positives and see how we can use  them to help us in our learning and keep spreading the message of the 21st Century to our communities.<br />
comment08</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon Harper</title>
		<link>http://edorigami.edublogs.org/2008/05/09/second-life-ban-it/#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon Harper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 00:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edorigami.edublogs.org/2008/05/09/second-life-ban-it/#comment-179</guid>
		<description>This is so destructive! Who are these politicians who think they can make rules about things that might possibly engage learners and make life fun.  Why do we apparently continue to vote in our collective wisdom for these enlightened representatives of our people? ARGGGGh
Thanks for the post Andrew, this is why I love social networking - I wouldn't know stuff without twitter - wonder when schools will block that?
Cheers
Sharon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is so destructive! Who are these politicians who think they can make rules about things that might possibly engage learners and make life fun.  Why do we apparently continue to vote in our collective wisdom for these enlightened representatives of our people? ARGGGGh<br />
Thanks for the post Andrew, this is why I love social networking - I wouldn&#8217;t know stuff without twitter - wonder when schools will block that?<br />
Cheers<br />
Sharon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
